Legal Opinion

People v. Sanders

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1922No. Crim. No. 2411PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

The appellant herein was tried and convicted upon the charge of extortion. In his appeal from the judgment entered upon such-conviction he makes two main contentions as grounds for the reversal of such judgment. These are, first, insufficiency of the indictment; second, insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment of conviction.

The defendant, with three other persons, whose names were Claude Morton, William W. Swan, and Lee Yarain, were accused by the grand jury of the county of Los Angeles, by indictment, of the crime of extortion. The charging part…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. Boyson v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. People v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Commonwealth v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hugh Wendell MacDonald v. James A. MusickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. People v. AstaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. In Re NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. People v. MassengaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API