Boyson v. Thorn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court;
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Defendant demurred to plaintiff’s complaint, the demurrer was sustained, aud judgment was thereupon rendered dismissing the action, from which judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The complaint alleges that Frank G. Newlands is the owner and in. possession and control of the Palace Hotel in the city of San Francisco, and of a public restaurant attached thereto, and conducted the same as a hotel and restaurant, and that the defendant during all the times mentioned in the complaint was the agent of Newlands, and as such had charge of the business thereof and direction of the servants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Benton v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Jones v. . StanlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Offshore Rental Co. v. Continental Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Luke v. DuPreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.