McArthur v. Lotridge

This appeal comes here from the district court of Tulsa county. The proceeding is one instituted by motion on the part of plaintiff in error to enforce an attorney’s lien pursuant to sections 4204 and 4207, O. S. 1931.

The parties plaintiff in error and defendant in error will be referred to herein as movant and respondent,. respectively.

The uneontroverted evidence produced substantially the following facts: One Irene Stewart claimed to possess a cause of action against respondent for personal injuries. On the 22nd day of February, 1933, she entered into a written contract with Shea & Trower,…