Legal Opinion
Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Thurman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 19, 1926No. 16423PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant in error-commenced this action on a written contract in the district court of Oklahoma county to- recover from the plaintiff in error a balance alleged to be due under the terms of the cuitract. The contract provides for the employment of the defendant in error as at-tc rney for the school board to assist the county attorney of Oklahoma county and the municipal counsellor of Oklahoma City in handling 619 tax suits filed in 1923, by various taxpayers against M. S. Ryan, county treasurer of Oklahoma county.
The contract provides compensation to the attorney upon a contingent basis…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Taylor v. BemissSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Morehouse v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Board of County Commissioners v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wunschel Law Firm, P.C. v. ClabaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Woods v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- BD. OF EDUCATION, WOODWARD PUB. SCHOOLS v. HensleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Renegar v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.