Legal Opinion
City of Barnsdall v. Curnutt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 4, 1945No. 31833PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Osage county, wherein the defendant in error, Mabel Curnutt, administratrix of the estate of H. M. Curnutt, deceased, hereinafter-called intervener, obtained a judgment against the plaintiff in error, hereafter called plaintiff, enforcing an attorney’s lien.
We find from the record that on January 25, 1941, the plaintiff by written contract employed H. M. Curnutt as its attorney to investigate and determine who was polluting the water supply of plaintiff and bring action for damages and to restrain further pollution. For his services H. M. Curnutt…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Morton v. ForseeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Western States Oil & Land Co. v. HelmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Simpson v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Lashley v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Landsing Diversified Properties-II v. First National Bank & Trust Co. (In re Western Real Estate Fund, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Western Real Estate Fund, Inc., Debtors. Landsing Diversified Properties-Ii v. The First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa v. Kevin M. Abel Abel & Busch, Inc., Third-Party-Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Lewsader v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Whitehead v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Musser v. MusserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.