Legal Opinion
Lemelson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 29, 1988No. 175-81CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In this patent action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, plaintiff, Jerome H. Lemel-son, seeks compensation from the United States for the alleged unauthorized use of the inventions covered by three United States patents owned by plaintiff, Reissue Patent No. 26,904 (the ’904 patent), Patent No. 3,412,431 (the ’431 patent), and Patent No. 3,259,958 (the ’958 patent).1 The devices used by the United States that are alleged to be covered by plaintiff’s patents are industrial robots purchased from third-party defendants Cincinnati Milacron, Inc. (Milacron) and Champion…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Messerschmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Judin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Casler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Penda Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Deuterium Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.