Legal Opinion
Casler v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 14, 1988No. 9-82CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In this patent action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, plaintiff, William A. Casler, seeks compensation from the United States for the alleged unauthorized use of a device allegedly covered by Claims 1, 3, and 4 of United States Patent No. 3,259,727 (the ’727 patent). The device in issue is a roll ring rotary electrical connector manufactured for the United States by Sperry Flight Systems (Sperry), a division of Sperry Corp. Defendant contends that it is not liable under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), because (1) plaintiff’s ’727 patent is invalid, and (2) in any event, the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ziggity Systems, Inc. v. Val Watering SystemsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Fastship, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- De Graffenried v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.