Legal Opinion
Judin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 17, 1993No. 573-89CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Plaintiff Herbert Judin claims that the United States has made use of his patented invention without providing just compensation. The patent at issue is U.S. Patent No. 3,656,832 (“ ’6,832 patent”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (1988). The United States served notice to various third-party defendants in accordance with RCFC 14(c). Among those third party defendants is Hewlett-Packard Corporation (“HP”). HP and the United States have jointly filed the instant Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Non-Infringement. The two latter parties…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Herbert Judin v. The United States, and Hewlett-Packard CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- CIVIX-DDI, LLC v. Cellco PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Penda Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.