Muskegon Co. v. Keystone Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
APPEAL BY DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ERIE COUNTY. No. 103 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 203 September Term 1888, C. P. On August 18,1888, the Muskegon Curtain-Roll Company brought assumpsit against the Keystone Manufacturing Company. Issue.
Read the full summary
APPEAL BY DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ERIE COUNTY. No. 103 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 203 September Term 1888, C. P. On August 18,1888, the Muskegon Curtain-Roll Company brought assumpsit against the Keystone Manufacturing Company. Issue. At the trial on October 12,1889, the plaintiff put in evidence an order in writing to the plaintiff company, at Muskegon, Michigan, by the defendant company at Girard, Pa., dated November 22, 1887, to make and ship at the plaintiff’s convenience three car loads of curtain rollers, afterwards reduced to two car loads. On…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
A careful examination of the numerous assignments has failed to satisfy us that the learned judge below committed any serious error, either in his rulings upon questions of evidence, or upon the law as applicable to the case. It was essentially a question for the jury, and it was submitted to them under adequate instructions.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Kimball Bros. v. DeereSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Gardner v. DeedsTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Hardinge Co. v. Eimco Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
- J. B. Colt Co. v. KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.