Kimball Bros. v. Deere
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Plow. W. R. G-reeN, Judge. ActioN at law to recover on a contract for tbe purchase of Columbia scales, and on an account. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
RobinsoN, O. J.
A copy of the contract in suit is as follows: “This agreement, made this twentieth day of February, 1893, by and between Kimball Bros., of the first part, and Deere, Wells & Co., of the second part, both of the city of Council Bluffs, state of Iowa, witnesseth: That the said first parties have appointed the said second parties agent for the sale of the Columbia scales for the following territory, to-wit: The three western tiers of counties in the state of Iowa; all of the state of Nebraska; that part of South Dakota lying south of the tier of counties traversed by the Pierre…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Black River Lumber Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Hosmer v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Hale v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Collins v. DelaporteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Hardwick v. American Can Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Gardner v. DeedsTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Worrell v. Kinnear Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- George Delker Co. v. Hess Spring & Axle Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.