Legal Opinion

Hardinge Co. v. Eimco Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1954No. 8000PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment entered in fa'or of plaintiff after a pre-trial confer mce, based on stipulated facts, answers to interrogatories, and documents filed by the parties. The trial court found that under a contract entered by the parties in March, 1945, and subsequently amended, the defendant, Eimco Corporation, was indebted to the plaintiff, Hardinge Company, in the amount of $6,232.12, which was the amount that Hardinge Company paid as freight on items shipped by Eimco from Salt Lake City to York, Pennsylvania. Other items on counterclaim were allowed the defendant but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harman v. Washington Fuel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Brown Et Ux. v. Cleverly Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Petty & Riddle, Inc. v. LuntUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Muskegon Co. v. Keystone Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bullfrog Marina, Inc. v. LentzUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Vernon v. Lake MotorsUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Utex Exploration Company v. Archie Garwood, R. C. Gerlach and W. E. BozmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Zeese v. Estate of SiegelUtah Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API