Legal Opinion
Marsoner v. Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 27, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 89-0131PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FERNANDEZ, Chief Judge.
The only issue involved in this case is whether appellant Pima County, acting through the board of supervisors, has authority under Arizona law to enact an ordinance requiring the licensing of adult amusement establishments. We agree with the trial court’s ruling that the board lacks such authority.
The issue presented is a question of law and is thus subject to de novo review by this court. City of Scottsdale v. Thomas, 156 Ariz. 551, 753 P.2d 1207 (App.1988).
On January 12, 1988, the Pima County Board of Supervisors enacted Ordinance No. 1988-14, which amended the Pima…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strode v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Associated Dairy Products Co. v. PageArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Scottsdale v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Maricopa County v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marsoner v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991