Legal Opinion
Marsoner v. Pima County
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1991No. CV-90-0144-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Chief Justice.
Pima County (the County) petitioned this court to review the court of appeals’ decision that the County, acting through its Board of Supervisors, lacks authority under Arizona law to enact an ordinance requiring the licensing of adult amusement establishments. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Between April and November 1987, the Disease Control Subcommittee of the Pima County Board of Health held several meetings to analyze and draft an ordinance regulating adult amusement…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Associated Dairy Products Co. v. PageArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Abbott v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- State Compensation Fund v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Maricopa County v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Cochise County v. KirschnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Hounshell v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson DanielsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009