Legal Opinion
Garneau v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1998No. 95-35920PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
In this ease we are asked to decide whether the enactment of the Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance by the City of Seattle effected a taking of property in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.1
*804I.
A
During the 1980s, Seattle area low-income tenants were hurt by a booming redevelopment market that led to a sharp increase in rental prices and a corresponding decrease in the number of rental units affordable to low-income tenants. In 1990, as part of the Growth Management Act, the Washington State Legislature adopted legislation enabling municipal…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- McClung v. City of SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.