Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 7, 1976No. 281-75PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.

Plaintiff claims personal injuries caused by the bursting of a new tire while he was mounting it on August 7, 1968. By complaint filed August 5, 1974, he sought recovery from (a) Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., alleging breach of express and implied warranty of merchantability and fitness for use, in manufacturing the tire, (b) Gans Surplus Tire Co., who sold the tire to Canney and Boyd, alleging breach of implied warranty of merchantability and fitness for use, and (c) Canney and Boyd, individual purchasers of the tire, for breach of duty in having the plaintiff mount their defective tire.

Defenda…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Zaleskie v. JoyceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  4. Murray v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  5. Halcy R. Maynard and Muriel Maynard v. General Electric Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Powers v. Office of Child SupportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Fitzgerald v. CongletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Alpstetten Ass'n, Inc. v. KellySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Long Trail House Condominium Assoc. v. Engelberth Construction, Inc. v. Morgan's Roofing & ConstructionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. Kellogg v. WyethDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API