Legal Opinion

Murray v. Allen

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 5, 1931PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

The defendant is a surgeon. On July 14, 1923, at the Brigbtlook Hospital in St. Johnsbury, be performed an abdominal operation upon the plaintiff. During this operation gauze sponges were placed in the abdominal cavity for the purpose of absorbing -the blood and fluid, but proper practice required their removal after its completion. After the operation the plaintiff remained in the hospital for two weeks, and returned three or four times thereafter for treatment, the last time being September 25, 1923, when she saw the defendant, who told her that “she was getting along fine.” She suffered…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. First Massachusetts Turnpike Corp. v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  4. Akridge v. NobleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Bodne v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Cavanaugh v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. Johnson v. St. Patrick's HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1966

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API