Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Congleton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 19, 1990No. 86-558PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff, Judy W. Fitzgerald, appeals from a decision of the trial court that her claim for legal malpractice was barred by 12 V.S.A. § 512(4). We hold that plaintiff’s claim is not barred in its entirety, and, accordingly, reverse.

I

On September 28, 1981, attorney William G. Congleton, defendant, was paid a retainer to represent plaintiff and her husband in a juvenile proceeding in which the State alleged that their son was a child in need of care and supervision. The proceeding was held that same date, and on behalf of his clients, defendant admitted certain allegations of the petition at…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. JewettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. SirmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Liberles v. County of CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Courtney v. CourtneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Town of Hinesburg v. DunklingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API