Legal Opinion
Kellogg v. Wyeth
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided October 20, 2010No. 2:07-mj-00082PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM K. SESSIONS III, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Ethel Kellogg brings suit against the brand name and generic manufacturers of metoclopramide (“MCP”) for strict product liability, breach of express and implied warranties, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and fraud by concealment. She alleges that the medication caused her to develop tardive dyskinesia, a neurological disorder causing involuntary repetitive tic-like movements. Defendants Wyeth and Actavis, Inc. have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the motions, ECF Nos. 204 & 211, are denied.
Factual…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Yanise Germain v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Sarah Speed v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Ebin v. Kangadis Food Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.