Legal Opinion
Davis v. Mukasey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 16, 2009No. Civil Action 08-452 (CKK)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Roy Steve Davis, a prisoner incarcerated under federal sentence, filed an amended pro se complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), naming as defendants the former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey, the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) and its Director, Harley G. Lappin, United States Penitentiary (“USP”) Lee Warden Terry O’Brien and Officer R. Sizemore, and Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) Gilmer employees…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bickford v. Government of the United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Schmidt v. ShahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Patel v. PhillipsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hammond v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Detar v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.