Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Shah
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 17, 2010No. Civil Action 08-1831 (CKK)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
This action arises out of Plaintiff Joseph James Schmidt’s employment with the United States Agency for International Development (“USAID”), which ended in March 2008 when Schmidt resigned from the agency. Prior to his resignation, Schmidt filed an employment discrimination complaint with the agency that was ultimately resolved through a settlement agreement. Schmidt brings this action pro se against Defendant Rajiv Shah in his official capacity as USAID Administrator claiming, inter alia, that the settlement agreement is invalid,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Allen v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Akers v. Beal BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Smalls v. EmanuelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lawrence v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.