Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 2010No. Civil Action No.: 08-0326 (RMU)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ renewed motion to dismiss. The pro se plaintiff, who was sentenced to a term of imprisonment in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, has asserted Fifth Amendment claims against certain individual defendants, as well as a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) against the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). In their renewed motion to dismiss, the defendants assert that the plaintiffs Fifth Amendment claims…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Jed Lineberry v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Pollard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Mensah-Yawson v. RadenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Al Kassar v. SamuelsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.