Legal Opinion
Bayuk Cigars, Inc. v. Schwartz
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 29, 1932No. 4036PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AVIS, District Judge.
This action is based upon the alleged unfair competition of the defendant, and involves the use of a trade name or names in the selling and marketing of cigars.
Plaintiff is a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, and for a number of years has been engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigars. Its factories have been operated mainly in the city of Philadelphia and state of Pennsylvania, although some of its cigars were made in the state of New Jersey, and possibly some in Pennsylvania outside of the city of Philadelphia.
Plaintiff since 1912 has used, on its labels and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Sweet Sixteen Co. v. Sweet "16" Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Tetlow v. TappanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Quaker State Oil Refining Co. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Aveda Corp. v. Evita Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Coca-Cola Co. v. BuschDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Mistolín de Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
- Western Stove Co. v. Geo. D. Roper CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.