Legal Opinion
Sweet Sixteen Co. v. Sweet "16" Shop, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 17, 1926No. 7234PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARIS, District Judge.
This is an action in equity for an injunction and an accounting, based on the alleged infringement of plaintiff’s trade-mark and. trade-name. The decree below went for defendant, and plaintiff appealed in conventional mode.
While numerous errors are assigned, there is, in the last analysis, but one question presented upon the record. That question is whether, upon the facts shown by the evidence, which were practically undisputed, plaintiff was entitled to the relief prayed for. Mere inspection and pronunciation disclose that the names of plaintiff and defendant are so…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Blisscraft of Hollywood v. United Plastics Company, Marmax Products Corp., and Morris Shapiro, Doing Business as Great Eastern Housewares CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Sweetarts, a Corporation v. Sunline, Inc., and Menlo F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Food Fair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.