Legal Opinion

Quaker State Oil Refining Co. v. Steinberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1936No. Appeal, 286PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

This is an appeal from the decree of the court below dismissing the complainant’s bill in equity by which it sought to enjoin defendants from using the term “Quaker City” or any trade name in which the word “Quaker” is used, in connection with the sale of their motor oil.

In 1914 the complainant commenced marketing a motor oil under the name “Quaker State.” It is prepared from crude oil produced in certain sections of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia, known in the trade and to the public as Pennsylvania Grade Crude Oil. From 1914 “Quaker State” oil…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. John Wright, Inc. v. Casper Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Pennsylvania State University v. University Orthopedics, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Hartman v. CohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Peters v. MacHikasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. KoolVent Metal Awning Corp. of America v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API