Davis v. Federal Land Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNck, J.
Title to the surface of the earth and title to the mining and mineral rights under the surface may be severed, and the mining and mineral rights being a part of the realty, title thereto is governed by the ordinary rules governing title to real property, and when severed they constitute two distinct estates. Vance v. Pritchard, 213 N. C., 552, 197 S. E., 182; Hoilman v. Johnson, 164 N. C., 268, 80 S. E., 249.
By virtue of C. S., 430, adverse possession of real property under known and visible lines and boundaries for twenty years gives title in fee to the possessor of such property, and this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Vance v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Hoilman v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Ray v. . AndersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Hayes v. Williamson-Brown Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Sanford v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Broadhurst v. American Colloid CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Diederich v. WareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.