Legal Opinion

Diederich v. Ware

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 23, 1956PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.

This case-presents the question whether oil rights granted by an ■ 1859 deed can be acquired through adverse possession by the' owner of the surface of the land by the drilling and operation of two oil wells in a corner of' a 56-acre tract.

The appellant, John T. Diederich, seeks a declaration of the rights of himself and others to royalties from two producing wells on a 56-acre tract, the surface rights to which are owned 'by the appellee,' E. C. Ware, and the trial court adjudged that the appellee had' acquired title to the oil by adverse possession through two wells…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Kinder v. LaSalle County Carbon Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Sanford v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Black v. Tenn. Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Thomas v. Wilcox TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Great Western Land Management, Inc. v. SlusherKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Letcher County Coal & Improvement Co. v. MarloweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
  5. Tomechko v. GarrettOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API