Legal Opinion

Pierce v. . Bierman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff instituted an action against the defendants, F. H. Bierman and wife, to recover $600 evidenced by three promissory notes. The defendants, Bierman and wife, filed a petition asking that the other defendants be made parties to the suit. This was done. Thereupon the Biermans filed an answer admitting the execution of the notes held by the plaintiff and setting up a cross-action against the other defendants. The cross-action of Bierman and wife against their codefendants is founded in substance upon the following facts: Bierman and wife owned a lot in Mecklenburg County on Hutchison…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Burton v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Keller v. . ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Harvey v. Kinston Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Biesecker v. BieseckerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. International Harvester Credit Corp. v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API