International Harvester Credit Corp. v. Bowman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
We note at the outset that defendants’ appeal is from an order “which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties” and is thus premature. N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 1A-1, Rule 54(b), North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Nevertheless, we choose to exercise our discretion to pass on the merits of defendants’ appeal.
The thrust of defendants’ argument on appeal is that summary judgment was inappropriate because of the existence of “multiple genuine issues of material fact” raised by the pleadings and supporting documents…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Gillespie v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Mills v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. AkelaitisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Loman-Garrett Supply Co., Inc. v. DudneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Eastway Wrecker Service, Inc. v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Abbington Spe, LLC v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Solum v. CertainTeed Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.