Keller v. . Parrish
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
By selling tbe mortgaged premises to Parrisb and Patterson, tbe mortgagors, E. M. Cain and bis wife, were not relieved of their personal liability on tbe notes which they bad executed to Hatcher and which Hatcher afterwards endorsed and transferred to tbe plaintiff. And because they accepted their deed subject to tbe mortgages tbe grantees were estopped to deny that tbe mortgages were valid. They became personally liable, not only to their grantor, but directly to tbe bolder of tbe notes and mortgages. Baber v. Hanie, 163 N. C., 588. It is therefore apparent that tbe question immediately…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Baber v. HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Rector v. . LydaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Bernard v. Shemwell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Canestrino v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Brown v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.