Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Scott v. Trousdale

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881No. 1,097PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPLICATION for mandamus before the Supreme Court. The facts are stated in the opinion. '

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Belknap, J.:

At the general election held in November, 1878, relator was elected a county commissioner of the county of Humboldt for the period of four years from the first Monday in January, 1879. He duly qualified, and on the last-named day entered upon the duties of his office, and has ever since continued to perform the same.

At the first meeting of the- board of county commissioners in the year 1879, the compensation of its members was fixed at six hundred dollars per annum, payable in *358equal quarterly payments of one hundred and fifty dollars. The board allowed relator’s claim…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conner v. . the Mayor, C. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. Conner v. MayorThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849
  3. Denver v. HobartNevada Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Andrews v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gubbins v. AnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Marcus v. State ex rel. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Miller v. LaniNevada Supreme Court · 1933
  4. County of Placer v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API