Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
A federal statute enacted in 1873 provides that certain *313prejudgment writs shall not be issued against national banks by state courts.1 The question presented by this case is whether that prohibition applies to a preliminary injunction restraining a national bank from holding a private foreclosure sale, pending adjudication of the mortgagor’s claim that the loan is not in default. We conclude that the prohibition does not apply.
Only the essentials of the rather complex three-party transaction giving rise to this dispute need be stated. Respondents borrowed $700,000 from petitioner, a national…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haggar Co. v. Helvering, Com'r of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Beecham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jack K. MOORE, Appellee, v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NC, Appellant, and Charlotte Police Department, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Arcadia v. Ohio Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.