Legal Opinion

Arcadia v. Ohio Power Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 22, 1991No. 89-1283PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

This case concerns the interpretation of § 318 of the Federal Power Act, as added, 49 Stat. 863, 16 U. S. C. § 825q, entitled “Conflict of jurisdiction,” which governs certain overlapping responsibilities of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the regulation of power companies under the Public Utility Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 803.

M

The Public Utility Act subjects some companies that transmit and distribute electric power to overlapping regulatory jurisdiction of the SEC and FERC, successor to the Federal Power Commission (FPC). Title…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Charles Short v. J. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  4. Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Hassan El-Fadl v. Central Bank of JordanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API