Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 22, 1998No. 89422PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
¶ 1 This case presents the issue of whether appellee, the Oklahoma Public Employees Relations Board (Board) was correct in ruling airport safety officers (ASOs) employed by appellant, City of Tulsa (City) are “police officers” covered by the Oklahoma Fire and Police Arbitration Act (FPAA), 11 O.S.1991, § 51-101 et seq., as amended 1 and in ordering an election for the ASOs to choose appel-lee, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Tulsa Local No. 523 (Union) as their bargaining agent for FPAA purposes. We hold the Board erred as a matter of law. Although the ASOs are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Fulsom v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Head v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- World Publishing Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.