Legal Opinion
Head v. McCracken
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 2, 2004No. 99,257PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
1 1 The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants/appellees, Walter Thomas and Rebecca Lucille McCracken, husband and wife (hereafter defendants) in regard to plaintiffs'/appellants', Theodore D. and Lori A. Head, husband and wife (hereafter plaintiffs) claim to damages, attorney fees and costs under the Nonjudicial Marketable Title Procedures Act (NMTPA), 12 0.98.2001, § 1141.1-1141.5, particularly § 1141.5(A) thereof. Plaintiffs filed a motion for new trial as to said claim, which the trial court denied. After their new trial motion was denied, plaintiffs filed a motion for an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Fulsom v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- SMITH v. CITY OF STILLWATERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.