Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. Leavitt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Chief Justice.
The questions we address today are: 1) whether the district court made an error of law by including the sub-surface storage area of an industrial waste injection well in computing the outer perimeter of the disposal site, and 2) whether Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. [TWIG] had standing to raise the issue of failure of notice and an opportunity to be heard. We answer the first question affirmatively, the second question negatively, and reverse.
FACTS
Environmental Solutions, Inc. [ESI] leased a forty acre tract of land located within the 16,000 acre Little Ranch in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Independent School District No. 9 v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Hart v. ParhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Texas Oklahoma Express v. SorensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- City of Hugo v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.