Legal Opinion
Richmond Wharf and Dock Co v. Blake
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1918No. Civ. No. 2515PublishedCited by 6 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
LENNON, P.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, who is the assignee of the rights of one A. S. Macdonald against the defendant herein.
In 1906 Macdonald was the owner of certain submerged land in the city of Richmond, which land is known as tide lot No. 16, and lies under the waters of the bay of San Francisco. The outer boundary line of said land runs about along the line of what is known as the bulkhead harbor line in the bay of San Francisco as established by the United States Government. The defendant was at that time the owner of the uplands lot lying back of Macdonald’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Knudson v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Associated Lathing & Plastering Co. v. Louis C. Dunn, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Alameda Conservation Assn. v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Weeshoff Construction Co. v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Favot v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Richmond Wharf & Dock Co. v. Blake Brothers Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.