Legal Opinion
Alameda Conservation Assn. v. City of Alameda
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 24, 1968No. Civ. 24287PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
Plaintiff sought to enjoin alleged dredging and filling of tidelands. Defendants are the City of Alameda, the board of trustees of Bay Farm Island Reclamation District No. 2105, Shore Line Properties, Inc., and the State of California. Plaintiff alleged that the lands in issue were granted to defendant city by a 1913 act of the California Legislature (Stats. 1913, ch. 348, p. 707, as amended by Stats. 1917, ch. 594, p. 709). This act specifically conveys the lands in trust, limiting their use to furtherance of commerce and navigation. If these lands were so conveyed, there could well be a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. JarvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Berkeley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Bogle Farms, Inc. v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Lawrence v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.