Knudson v. Kearney
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant to quiet title to a parcel of tide-land containing about two acres situated on the southern shore of San Francisco Bay. He alleged that he was the owner and was in possession thereof. These allegations were put in issue by the answer, and the defendant’s title and right of possession were also set up by affirmative allegations.
In response to these issues the court found that the plaintiff was not, and never had been, in possession of any of the land, except a rectangular part thereof thirty-five by one hundred and fifty feet in extent; that he had no title or right of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Knight v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- City of San Francisco v. StrautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hyman v. ReadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Berkeley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Newport Beach v. FagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Bogle Farms, Inc. v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.