Legal Opinion
Weeshoff Construction Co. v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 2, 1979No. Civ. 52771PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
This appeal by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District arises out of a judgment granting damages to Weeshoff Construction Company in the amount of $31,781 for extra work performed during the execution of a construction contract.
The district now appeals the judgment, contending damages were improperly awarded. It claims: (a) there was no change in the original contract which required additional compensation for the plaintiff; (b) even if contractual change did occur, the district’s failure to issue a written change order in accordance with the contract’s “Change in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Frank T. Hickey, Inc. v. Los Angeles Jewish Community CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Los Angeles City School District v. Landier Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- KATSURA v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- P&D Consultants, Inc. v. City of CarlsbadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Miller v. United States (In Re Miller)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Schram Construction, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Roth v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.