Legal Opinion

Stvartak v. Eastman Kodak Co.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided November 15, 1996No. 95-518-Civ-ORL-19PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

GLAZEBROOK, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Eastman Kodak Company [“Kodak”] employed plaintiff Ronald S. Stvartak [“Stvartak”] for sixteen years as a technical sales representative. On May 19, 1989, Kodak informed Stvartak that Kodak was terminating his employment. At that time, Stvartak was a plan participant in two employee welfare benefit plans providing disability benefits. Kodak established and maintained the plans pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), (3), (5), (7), (8); Defendant’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Kevin L. Lee v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Richards v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
  2. Adams v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  3. Featherston v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2004
  4. Schreck v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
  5. Clarke v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API