Stvartak v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
GLAZEBROOK, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Eastman Kodak Company [“Kodak”] employed plaintiff Ronald S. Stvartak [“Stvartak”] for sixteen years as a technical sales representative. On May 19, 1989, Kodak informed Stvartak that Kodak was terminating his employment. At that time, Stvartak was a plan participant in two employee welfare benefit plans providing disability benefits. Kodak established and maintained the plans pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), (3), (5), (7), (8); Defendant’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kevin L. Lee v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Richards v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Adams v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Featherston v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2004
- Schreck v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
- Clarke v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.