Legal Opinion
Featherston v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided August 30, 2004No. 3:03cv392/RV/MDPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINSON, District Judge.
Pending is the plaintifPs objection to Magistrate Judge Davis’ order of March 29, 2004, granting defendant’s protective order. (Doc. *65038). Judge Davis granted a motion for a protective order filed by the defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met-Life”), which prevents the plaintiff, Mary F. Featherston, from engaging in discovery. Pursuant to Rule 72(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff has filed this objection to the Magistrate’s order.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Prior to 1994, the plaintiff purchased through her employer, Bank of America, an insurance…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Vilma Lissette Vega Jose Vega v. National Life Insurance Services, Inc., Pan-American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allen v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
- Hamall-Desai v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Rosser-Monahan v. Avon Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
- Mattox v. Life Insurance Co. of North America ("Lina")District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Melech v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.