Legal Opinion
Richards v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 1, 2004No. 03-81066-CIV-RYSKAMP, 03-81066-CIV-VITUNACPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RYSKAMP, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court pursuant to the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (“Hartford” and “Fidelity”; collectively “Defendants”) moved for summary judgment on September 16, 2004 [DE 33]. Rosemary Richards (“Plaintiff’) moved for summary judgment on September 28, 2004 [DE 38]. The Court heard oral argument on these motions on November 17, 2004. These motions are…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pylant v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Anderson v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
- Bloom v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Richey v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Rosemary R. Richards v. Hartford Life & AccidentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.