Loomis, Inc. v. Cudahy

DONALDSON, Justice.

A contract was entered into between the appellant-third party plaintiff Audrie B. Cudahy and the respondent-third party defendant John R. Smith on February 2,1976. Smith was to perform for compensation by Cudahy services as an architect in the construction of a single-family dwelling. The contract contained an arbitration clause.1 It also recited that the house would be built on a particular lot, but in fact the house was built on a different lot. Upon Smith’s recommendation, Cudahy entered into a construction contract with a contractor. A performance bond was issued by…