Legal Opinion

World Brilliance Corporation v. Bethlehem Steel Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 2, 1965No. 195, Docket 29142PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:

On August 15, 1956, Bethlehem Steel Company entered into a contract, later assigned by the other party to World Brilliance Corporation, to build the vessel Princess Sophie. The contract guaranteed World against defects discovered within six months after delivery of the vessel, and it provided for arbitration of “any dispute or difference arising between the parties * * * as to any matter or thing arising out of or relating to” the contract. The vessel was delivered on May 18, 1959. World reported numerous alleged defects to Bethlehem within the next six months, but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. Robert Lawrence Co. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. In the Matter of James B. Carey, as President of International Union of Electrical Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons & Crosfield, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Stuart L. Bell v. Cendant Corporation, American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Application of Conticommodity Services Inc., for an Order Restraining Arbitration Attempted to Be Had by Philipp & LionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Prudential Lines, Inc., and Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Crossmark, Inc. v. Hazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API