Legal Opinion
Borah v. McCandless
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 2009No. 34756PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Justice.
This appeal arises from a contract for the sale of logs to be used in the construction of a cabin. Following a bench trial, the district court concluded that Appellant Dana McCandless breached the contract by failing to deliver the logs within a reasonable time and awarded damages and attorney fees to Respondent Brenda Borah. We affirm and award attorney fees on appeal.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In March 2004, Borah contacted McCandless, who operated under the name Great Snake River Log Home Company, to discuss the possibility of purchasing logs to build a cabin on a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Anderson & Nafziger v. G. T. Newcomb, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Campbell v. St John HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- AED, Inc. v. KDC Investments, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- City of Meridian v. PETRA Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Vreeken v. Lockwood Engineering, B.V.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Leotis B. Branigh, IIIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.