Albermont Petroleum, Ltd. v. Cunningham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
On December 24, 1958, plaintiff corporation sued defendants Cunningham and Healy on a $25,000 promissory note due December 4, 1958, executed by them on September 5, 1958. The complaint alleged that the note was given in consideration of a dismissal with prejudice of a suit for $100,000 brought by plaintiff against defendants, then pend ing in the United States District Court entitled “Albermont Petroleums, Limited, a corporation, vs. Lee Healy and C. D. Cunningham. ’ ’ The answer filed January 28, 1959, denied all allegations of the complaint including the execution of the note, but admitted…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Wisniewski v. ClaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- In Re Richard S.California Supreme Court · 1991
- California Court Reporters Ass'n v. Judicial CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- State Board of Retirement v. BulgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.