Legal Opinion
Johnson v. New Mexico Oil Conservation Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1999No. 25,061, 25,062PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Chief Justice.
{1} This is an appeal from the district court’s review of an order by the New Mexico Oil Conservation Commission, which increased the spacing requirements for deep wildcat gas wells in certain areas of the state. Specifically, the Commission and the real party in interest, Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co., appeal the district court’s ruling that the order is without effect as to Timothy P.' Johnson and other individual holders (Holders) of working interests and operating rights affected by the order.
{2} After the Commission issued its order, Holders timely…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Steven J. Harris v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- New Mexico v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2004
- Elane Photography, LLC v. WillockNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Rayellen Res., Inc. v. N.M. Cultural Props. Review Comm.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
- Bounds v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.