Legal Opinion

High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1998No. 24,297PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKINNON, Justice.

{1} High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture (Hinkle) appeals from a zoning decision of the appellee, City of Albuquerque (City) through its Council. The City’s first decision on the interpretation of the ordinance in question was remanded to it after an appeal to the Court of Appeals. High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of Albuquerque, 119 N.M. 29, 888 P.2d 475 (Ct.App.1994) [hereinafter Hinkle I ]. The City’s second interpretation was made in February 1995, and Hinkle again appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the ruling. High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Burroughs v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, CTY., BERNALILLONew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Marbob Energy Corp. v. New Mexico Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Mitchell-Carr v. McLendonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. HeinsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bishop v. Evangelical Good Samaritan SocietyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API