Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Klineline v. Blackhurst
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 1988No. 16973, 17062PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Defendants Paul and Juanita Klineline, husband and wife (the Klinelines), filed a motion for rehearing, which we granted. The unpublished decision filed on October 28, 1987 is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place.
The Klinelines appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiffs Henry and Jane Deaton, husband and wife (the Deatons). After having purchased certain residential property (residence) from the Property Tax Division of the Taxation and Revenue Department (the Division) at a tax sale, the Deatons filed suit against the Klinelines…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- First National Bank v. Southwest Yacht & Marine Supply Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith MacHinery Corp. v. Hesston, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.