Legal Opinion

State v. Lund

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1930No. 4950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElias Hansen, J.

The trial of this action in the court below resulted in the jury rendering a verdict finding “the defendant, Rex Lund, guilty of receiving money from the proceeds of the earnings of a woman engaged in prostitution as charged in the information.” Defendant was sentenced to serve an indeterminate term in the state prison. He appeals.

The charging part of the information filed against the defendant reads as follows:

“That the said Rex Lund on the 10th day of March, A. D. 1929, at the County of Salt Lake, State of Utah, did wilfully, unlawfully, knowingly, and feloniously accept and receive from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. GesasUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. HaleUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. McKennaUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State v. SteeleUtah Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. WoolmanUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State of Arizona v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Commonwealth v. ThetoniaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. State v. PritchettUtah Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API